yytaya.blogg.se

Furthermore there is a bug in the catalina installer. Apple moved stuff inside the full installer which seemed to confuse installinstallmacos.py.

One thing I should say about installinstallmacos.py though is that for the first time ever I saw it fail for 10.15 beta 4.

I prefer that script because it actually gives you somewhat more control over what happens. But I used installinstallmacos.py instead. I too have the full installer for 10.15.1. Softwareupdate -fetch-full-installer -full-installer-version 10.15.1īeware however that these commands ONLY work in Catalina (and probably future versions of macos). You can be more specific with the following command instead which may avoid such difficulties in future: The command softwareupdate -fetch-full-installer is a little too non-specific which may have been the cause of your difficulties. I will say personally, I never had any issue(s) on any version of iOS 13, however, now with 13.2, things are more polished and with the added features it just works like it is a truly complete version of iOS/iPadOS.and yes I know Apple is always working on their OS's, but at least we have stable and smooth ones to work with now, among other things.*** Very stable, new features, and Deep Fusion is amazing. IOS & iPadOS 13.2, are also what we should have got on launch day. I would recommend upgrading to that if you have not yet, and it supports AW Series 1 & 2.finally! Battery life is much better, and the watch just seems overall more responsive than it did on 6.0. ***Also, not to get sidetracked too much, but watchOS 6.1 is running incredible on my Series 5 AW. In fact, I have not run into one single problem at all.įor those of you waiting, I would say it is certainly okay to install macOS Catalina 10.15.1! As chris4565 said above, this is the version of Catalina that SHOULD have been released to the public on launch day! I have not run into any issues with missing album artwork (maybe because I did a fresh install?) or any general issues with Catalina not being stable etc. *If you want to know the other machines I am installing/setting up on, just look at my signature.* So, I am getting everything setup the way I like it on my MacBook Pro's and honestly, Catalina is running amazingly smooth and very stable! Right now I am setting Catalina up on my 2015 MacBook Pro. However, when I read about the disaster that was launch day Catalina, for the first time ever, I said "No thank you, I'll wait!" 1 update to install a new Apple OS, as I am pretty quick to install everything new, as I have a paid Apple Developer account and install and test most all the beta software that comes out. I just did a fresh install of Catalina 10.15.1, and have run into zero issues.so far.knock on wood! This is the first time I waited for a. So the code and UI for the Emoji picker was changed too. This requires special handling.Īpple proposed and it was accepted in Unicode 12.1 that these cases are no longer equivalent, so the code has to be modified again to strip out the exception because the latter case is a new emoji, ?‍?‍? Men Holding Hands: Light Skin Tone, Medium-Light Skin Tone.Īnd if you actually tried this on an Apple device, you'd see that Apple modified the Emoji picker to let you choose the two skin colors independently, in an order sensitive fashion. That is, Unicode 12.0 specifies in the case of same-sex Emoji couples with differing skin colors, there is only one Emoji defined out of the two possible orderings of skin color (the darker person on the left). In cases where it's Man/Man or Woman/Woman, but NOT Man/Woman. ? Man + ZWJ + ? Emoji Modifier Fitzpatrick Type-1-2 + ZWJ + ? Handshake + ZWJ + ? Man +ZWJ + ? Emoji Modifier Fitzpatrick Type-3 ? Man + ZWJ + ? Emoji Modifier Fitzpatrick Type-3 + ZWJ + ? Handshake + ZWJ + ? Man +ZWJ + ? Emoji Modifier Fitzpatrick Type-1-2 ?‍?‍? Men Holding Hands: Medium-Light Skin Tone, Light Skin Tone is represented in Unicode as ? Man + ZWJ + ? Emoji Modifier Fitzpatrick Type-3 + ZWJ + ? Handshake + ZWJ + ? Man +ZWJ + ? Emoji Modifier Fitzpatrick Type-1-2.Īs the article says, Unicode 12.0 specifies I apparently know a lot more than you and you didn't read anything in the link.Įmojis are not necessarily single characters/codepoints.